The gloves are off
I haven't given up on this channel....just taking a break from online due to a mixture of loads of work on and getting bored with the deposit £500 for fuck all entertainment.
Normal service will be resumed when I hit some luck and get some spare time!
Reply
Let's be honest, on-line is just as bad as bookies. You can big up the extra few % all you like but don't think that means games can't take a bag off you without doing fuck all.

Amazing how bookies get all the negative press and yet these on line casinos seem to get away with it.

Almost certain these idiot MP's aren't even aware you can load up games online and do a grand a spin. More interested on jumping on the bandwagon elsewhere it seems.
Reply
The following 2 users Like PMK's post:
Mr Move It, SmegHead
Yeah a good point I've raised with people aswell why are they worried about 100/spin in bookies when you can pull out your mobile phone pissed up anywhere in the country and spin thousands a spin!

Surely the problem gamblers would just move their play from bookies to online/phone/casino, taking away one route of gambling isn't gonna solve their problem. They'll always find a way!

The extra percentage doesn't really mean a lot unless you are doing very long sessions in any case, you wouldn't be able to tell the difference in the same game paying 90 vs 96%.

Certainly makes a difference on compensated games like pub hi techs though, pity admiral arcades have decided to ditch most of theirs (admittedly normally poor choice) on 88/90% for bloody magic games HD terminals. Ffs you don't need 6 off those in one bloody shop you already have 6 old admiral games machines 3 VIP magic games things and 4 500 HD magic games!!!! Yeh I know novamatic own them so they just give them they're own games, but it makes for a very boring selection!
Reply
The following 2 users Like ob's post:
proevodaddy, SmegHead
Playing a bankers birthday in an admiral on 90% a few months back was actually quite a lot of fun
Reply
can't tell the difference between 90 and 96%?!!!

i wouldn't wan to have to try wager out a 3k balance at the bookies!!!!
Reply
The following 2 users Like HoveSam's post:
adamtheaddict, turbovamp
Was in a Nobles the other week they have 'Admiral Radio' now somehow managed to make it even worse than Quicksilver radio! (Although they even fucking own those now anyway so what is the point really!)

Even the £500 777 terminals have all pretty much vanished for shitty 888 terminals with no gamble on Rainbow Richards and the like!

I used to enjoy the arcade when you had the decent range of fruits, decent £70 community games, entertaining £500 games that weren't so flat and shit but now they're all pretty much an exact clone of each other and nothing exciting as the terminals have so many fucking games you can't even go 'oh high pots on that I'll give it a go' as most are just slightly above reset due to too much fucking choice on the menus! 'Classic Slots' 'Rainbow Richards Slots' 'Free Spins Slots' 'Slots With Pots' 'Popular Slots' JUST FUCK OFF AND HAVE ONE SCREEN OF SLOTS YOU'RE NOT THE FUCKING BOOKIES!
Reply
I can also probably count on one hand the number of times I have ever seen people sat at those huge massive waste of money take up half the arcade VIP terminals actually playing them!
Reply
Also quite funny now how you can get free spins in Nobles by SIGNING UP TO THEM USING THEIR OWN WIFI INTERNET CONNECTION USING YOUR MOBILE TELEPHONE!!!

But...but...but I thought mobile telephones could manipulate the faultys?!

Oh that's right you alienated most of your customers with that stupid policy and now you're paying the price as they've all fucked off to the bookies or online!
Reply
The following 1 user Likes ridye's post:
SmegHead
(05-08-2017, 10:25 PM)HoveSam Wrote: can't tell the difference between 90 and 96%?!!!

i wouldn't wan to have to try wager out a 3k balance at the bookies!!!!

Yeh I did say unless you have a big session!!!!
Reply
Suprised Nova group haven`t moved into the Sunbed market too
Reply
The following 1 user Likes turbovamp's post:
SmegHead
Reply
(05-08-2017, 11:05 PM)ob Wrote:
(05-08-2017, 10:25 PM)HoveSam Wrote: can't tell the difference between 90 and 96%?!!!

i wouldn't wan to have to try wager out a 3k balance at the bookies!!!!

Yeh I did say unless you have a big session!!!!

life is one long session
Reply
The following 1 user Likes russthebus's post:
HoveSam
Something a bit different


Reply
That last vid was certainly different! I figured that the Pharaohs popping out were trigger points and when you got 3 it re-triggered for more spins. What was going on at 0:30 when the symbols kept flicking over like on one of those old railway station clocks?
Reply
(05-21-2017, 05:50 PM)Mr Move It Wrote: That last vid was certainly different! I figured that the Pharaohs popping out were trigger points and when you got 3 it re-triggered for more spins. What was going on at 0:30 when the symbols kept flicking over like on one of those old railway station clocks?

The symbol that looks like a head embedded in a stone is wild, so the graphic slides the symbol that matches over the wild to show the win.
If you get 3 or more of a kind of premium symbols, you get an additional graphic where it rotates on a kind of sundial table, it means nothing but is a nice ambient touch.
Reply
The following 1 user Likes kidgloves's post:
Mr Move It
On a bonus with WR hence the stake

Reply
Online is much much more dangerous than Fobts.

Anyone who believes otherwise is deluded.
Reply
The following 1 user Likes KimGreen's post:
Mr Move It
Depends if you're an addict or not. If not, then no, it isn't.
Reply
It's certainly not less dangerous that's for sure!

It's in most gamblers nature to chase games tbh not just addicts!!! Chasing doesn't make you an addict, if it does then I'm a certified addict lol, but I hardly ever play online/bookies randoms and don't have urges to do it ever really tbf!!!
Reply
I get the impression that Hyperlinx believes he can make a very decent living from online slots judging by his videos and OTT computer he built especially for it.

Reckless Rocknrolla seems to had a bad influence I reckon
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)